Red, Yellow, Green: Some D.C. Traffic Light History

This is one of those “did you know” posts, sharing some great trivia to share with your friends. It’s the kind you’re more likely to dig up on one of our favorite blogs, Greater Greater Washington.

Traffic lights are a pain in the ass. The light turns yellow, what do you typically do? You’re supposed to slow down, but you probably speed up. And, if traffic is just creeping along, do you sneak across the line and hope that it clears up enough for you to get across the intersection? Inevitably, you become the asshole blocking the box.

I was sitting behind an a-hole block boxer the other day, hopelessly watching the light cycle again, and of course I wondered what the history of the traffic light was in Washington (I also cursed a little and may have honked my horn).

chaos of traffic before street signals (1913)

chaos of traffic before street signals (1913)

A little research uncovered a proposed change in the D.C. traffic light system back in the 1920s. Below is the article, published on July 31st, 1927 in the Washington Post, where we uncovered this.

A new system of traffic signal lights, eliminating the amber light before the green will be placed in operation on local streets it is indicated.

The new plan will not confuse those who have their habits adjusted to the present system. It simply will abolish automatically the worst violation of the present arrangement that police have to contend with–starting on the amber light before the green appears.

Under the new system, the amber light still shows before the red. The new cycle then consists of three lights, red, green, amber, after which the cycle repeats, with the amber preceding the red for a brief interval. The present cycle consists of four lights, red, amber, green, amber.

The new arrangement works simply. The cycle embraces 80 seconds, as now. The red light will show for 40 seconds, and the green light for 40 seconds. But during the last 5 seconds that the green light showing the amber light also will show as a forewarning that the red, or stop light, will show again when the 5 seconds are up.

The green light therefore will show 35 seconds. Then the green and amber light will show together for 5 seconds. They will both flash out simultaneously, and the red light will show for 40 seconds, completing the cycle. The main thing, however is that the red light will flash immediately to green.

Under the present arrangement the red light shows 35 seconds, the amber light 5 seconds, the green light 35 seconds and the amber light again 5 seconds.

William H. Harland, director of traffic, said yesterday that he probably would recommend this system to the Commissioners for all future traffic lights to be installed in the city.

Harland, however, is thoroughly opposed to the elimination of the amber light altogether. The Public Utilities Commission recently recommended to Harland that the amber light be omitted from a traffic light soon to be installed. He declared yesterday that he would not sanction the complete elimination of the amber light under any circumstances.

In fact, it is now in operation at what is probably the worst intersection in the city, Fifteenth street and New York avenue. There street cars make right and left hand turns on the red light. The result is that motor vehicle and street car traffic do not interfere with each other, and are able to use the intersection equally. It is interesting to stand at the intersection and observe how well the new system handles so bad a traffic situation.

From what I’m reading in this article, it seems like the streets of Washington in the 1920s were exceedingly dangerous, full of reckless drivers. But, is that so different from today?

January 5, 1926. Washington, D.C. "Traffic Director Eldridge inspecting new lights." National Photo Company Collection glass negative.

January 5, 1926. Washington, D.C. “Traffic Director Eldridge inspecting new lights.” National Photo Company Collection glass negative.

The next part of the article gets a little confusing and hard to follow.

Other violations in connection with the traffic lights are going through a red light, for which the motorist may be arrested for reckless driving, and making a left-hand turn in the line of traffic, which also may be classed as reckless driving.

To make a left-hand turn on streets controlled by lights the motorist should pull over on the right-hand side to the crosswalk of the cross street, and then pull far ahead to the opposite side of the cross street. This will give the motorist behind him a chance to prepare for a left-hand turn also, or permit the motorist desiring to make a right-hand turn to go ahead. Above all things he should keep to the right, and not stop right in the middle of the street. Then when the light changes to green on the cross street he may go ahead. The right turn is made against the right light on the cross street, and never when traffic is moving on the cross street.

Cars, streetcars, pedestrians, bicycles, horses, buggies, the streets were absolutely chaotic. Can you imagine the days before traffic lights? Even more of a disaster.

Here is a fascinating article on the Washington Post about the inner workings of the traffic light system. Also, don’t forget to check out our post on the traffic light bandit.

Get more GoDC posts by email

Sign up to receive our great posts right in your inbox!

  • http://www.edwardhoover.com Ed Hoover

    Interesting. So the traffic light pattern of the 1920s resembled what it does today in much of Europe – green-amber-red, and then red-amber-green. (When I first went to the U.K. and saw the amber light preceding the green, we called this the “ready-set-go” light.) Interesting to note, though, that today, when the amber comes on before green, the red is still illuminated. Perhaps this is to prevent the “worst violation of the present arrangement that police have to contend with–starting on the amber light before the green appears.”

    • Matt M

      I’m told by my DC friends currently living in London that the amber-coming-back-on-again-before-green is supposedly intended to indicate to drivers that they may proceed AS LONG AS there are no pedestrians in the crosswalk. In other words, the lights are supposedly all red at that point in order to give pedestrians time to clear the intersection, but if there are none around, you don’t have to wait. My friend also says that most drivers are not clear about this distinction and wind up nearly running over pedestrians when they see that amber light come back on.

      For me, though, yeah, it sure seems like “a ready, set go” light…as in, step on your brake, floor the gas, and when the light finally goes green…peel out! ;)

  • Jim Steele

    Rev. Jim Ignatowski: Psssst. What does a yellow light mean?

    Bobby Wheeler: Slow down.

    Rev Jim: What . . . does . . . a yellow . . . light . . . mean?

  • Matthew Gilmore

    Remember you are only looking at one of the smaller DC newspapers of the day; the morning also-ran. If you actually want to do this well, at least consider the DC papers in Library of Congress’s Chronicling America http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/ and even check out the various online sources of the Evening Star.

  • Mr. DC Memories

    I’ve noticed from viewing Russian Dash Cam videos on YouTube that some of the center amber lenses on Russian traffic signals have been replaced with a “60 to zero” digital countdown readout, much like the countdown seen on the newest pedestrian crossing signals in the U.S.. It would be useful to know how many seconds of green signal remain before the red signal returns.